HomeBlogAPI ManagementAzure API Management vs. AWS API Gateway: A comparison for banks and insurance companies

Azure API Management vs. AWS API Gateway: A comparison for banks and insurance companies

This site is also available in: Deutsch (German)

1. security: protection of sensitive financial data

Security is the most important criterion for banks and insurance companies when selecting an API gateway.

Azure API Management

  • Offers comprehensive security functions such as OAuth2, OpenID Connect, JWT and Mutual TLS (mTLS).
  • Enables IP whitelisting, firewalls and network integrations with Azure Virtual Network.
  • Automatic DDoS defense mechanisms through Azure Security Center.
  • Full adherence to compliance standards such as GDPR, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001 and FINMA.

AWS API Gateway

  • Supports AWS IAM, Lambda Authorizer, OAuth2, JWT and API Keys for access control.
  • Integrates seamlessly with AWS Shield for DDoS defense.
  • Can be combined with AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) to implement targeted protection measures.
  • Meets compliance requirements such as SOC 1/2/3, GDPR, PCI-DSS, FINMA and HIPAA.

Conclusion: Both platforms offer high security standards, but Azure scores with closer integration into company networks through Azure Virtual Network.

2. scalability: manage API traffic efficiently

Azure API Management

  • Enables automatic scaling through Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).
  • Provides a caching system to process repeated requests more efficiently.
  • Can be used in hybrid and multi-cloud scenarios.
  • Suitable for companies with a high API volume, e.g. Open Banking.

AWS API Gateway

  • Scales automatically with AWS Lambda and Amazon ECS.
  • Has a burst mode that is suitable for irregular API traffic.
  • Provides edge-optimized delivery to deliver APIs globally with low latency.
  • Perfectly suited for microservices architectures.

Conclusion: AWS API Gateway is better for event-driven and microservices architectures, while Azure API Management is ideal for large enterprise APIs with constantly high traffic.

3. integration: cloud and on-premise connectivity

Azure API Management

  • Tight integration with Azure services such as Azure Functions, Logic Apps and Event Grid.
  • Connects on-premises systems using Hybrid Connections and ExpressRoute.
  • Enables API deployment directly from Visual Studio and Azure DevOps.

AWS API Gateway

  • Native connection with AWS Lambda, Step Functions and DynamoDB.
  • Hybrid support through AWS Direct Connect and AWS VPN.
  • Direct integration in AWS CodePipeline and Terraform.

Conclusion: Azure is the better choice for companies that rely heavily on Microsoft products, while AWS API Gateway is ideal if AWS services are already in use.

4. costs: price structure and profitability

Azure API Management

  • Pricing based on instance types (Developer, Basic, Standard, Premium).
  • Monthly fixed costs with additional fees for API calls.
  • Advantageous for large, constant API loads.

AWS API Gateway

  • Uses a pay-per-use model in which API calls are charged per million requests.
  • Additional costs for data transfer and CloudFront acceleration.
  • Better suited for variable API traffic patterns.

Conclusion: Azure is more predictable, but AWS is often cheaper for low to medium API usage.

Conclusion: Which platform is the right choice?

  • Azure API Management is ideal for banks and insurance companies that use enterprise APIs, hybrid environments and Microsoft integrations.
  • AWS API Gateway is ideal for cloud-native applications, event-driven architectures and microservices.

Both solutions offer outstanding functions – the choice depends on the specific requirements of your company. Do you need advice? ONLU is at your side as your IT consulting partner in Switzerland!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *